I greatly appreciated the critique by Vandana Shiva on globalization and agriculture especially in India, one of the greatly disproportionately unindustrialized countries today. Obviously globalization on paper as an idea looks greatly efficient in an economic sense. In this sense, each country should produce what they can do so the most efficiently, and then trade for the rest, meaning they should stick to those products which they have a comparative advantage producing. This in theory is correct, but as Vandana pointed out, homogenizing cultures, and attempting countries to take on practices which do not serve them is hardly worth what is being lost to some. I like to look at it like investing, would you put all of your money in one high risk stock portfolio? You could, but you'd have a lot to lose, it would be smarter to invest in a variety of ways, bonds, stocks, mutual funds. In this comparison, small and large commercial farms across the globe could be the answer. Certainly I feel that leaders of the world need to unite in that we are all of the same human species, and have similar needs when it comes to nutrients. Working together to achieve some amount of economic efficiency while preserving the cultural diversity would be a great goal, one that is likely already being sought after.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Globalization
I greatly appreciated the critique by Vandana Shiva on globalization and agriculture especially in India, one of the greatly disproportionately unindustrialized countries today. Obviously globalization on paper as an idea looks greatly efficient in an economic sense. In this sense, each country should produce what they can do so the most efficiently, and then trade for the rest, meaning they should stick to those products which they have a comparative advantage producing. This in theory is correct, but as Vandana pointed out, homogenizing cultures, and attempting countries to take on practices which do not serve them is hardly worth what is being lost to some. I like to look at it like investing, would you put all of your money in one high risk stock portfolio? You could, but you'd have a lot to lose, it would be smarter to invest in a variety of ways, bonds, stocks, mutual funds. In this comparison, small and large commercial farms across the globe could be the answer. Certainly I feel that leaders of the world need to unite in that we are all of the same human species, and have similar needs when it comes to nutrients. Working together to achieve some amount of economic efficiency while preserving the cultural diversity would be a great goal, one that is likely already being sought after.
Food Safety
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Organic Food Production
Biotechnology Quiz Replacement
It is my personal desire to have access to information about whether the foods I am eating have been produced using biotechnology. I understand that because the term biotechnology means many different things, that it would be an enormous task to label all products with this information. Foremost there would be a large cost associated with this undertaking, due to labeling standards and policies. Currently the practice is that you need not label the food if produced using biotechnology, but some companies do, in order to appeal to those who do not want to eat altered foods. Fortunately I attempt to eat mainly organic foods, and in doing so I know that at least in theory the foods I'm consuming are not altered by biotechnology. If it turns out that more food than not will be produced using biotechnology then it makes sense that those NOT using it should be labeled as to save time and money. Labeling will cause an increase in costs all the way down the line. I personally would like those who implement the technology to be charged, but judging by the way economics work, everyone would feel that cost in the long run.
Topic #8 Biotechnology
Over half of the world's 2004 soybean crop (56%) was genetically modified, a higher percentage than for any other crop. Each year, the EU Member States import approximately 40 million tons of soy material, primarily destined for use as cattle, swine, and chicken feed. Soybeans are also used to produce many food additives.
Soybeans originated in Asia, and now 55% of the world’s production is in the U.S. We export 1/3 of that back to other countries for consumption. In the U.S. soy has gained recent attention for its high protein content and other beneficial nutrient makeup, and has become a new staple in the American diet. They are still consumed mostly in China, Japan and Korea, but many other countries in Europe and now the U.S. are also consuming soybeans, their byproducts.
Soybeans are an annual legume that are very tolerant of many different growing conditions. They are self-pollinating, but need to be re-sown from seed every year. Soybeans grow best in warm temperate climates with moderate amounts of rainfall (Levetin and McMahon, 2006). Little if any fertilizer is needed due to the fact that the Soybean is a legume, although it is often planted with certain microorganisms that are preferable for nitrogen fixing. Soybeans are typically grown as a monoculture crop in rows, and then picked at the end of their growing season to become many different products. Tofu, soymilk, forage hay, cloth and oil are all possible end products of soybeans.
It definately seems that we would not be able to produce as much soy if biotechnology were not used, which would greatly affect many aspects of this food source. This fact doesnt stop me from buying it organically however.